智能教育与教学
Journal of Intelligent Education and Teaching
- Publisher:Eastern Sunshine Publishing House Limited
- ISSN Print:3080-8405(P)
- ISSN Online:3080-8413(O)
- Subject Category:Educational Sciences
- Publication Frequency:Monthly
- Submissions:0
- Views:183
Related
- Construction and Practice of a Hybrid Teaching Model Empowered by Intelligent Technology: a Case Study of the Course “Mechanical Manufacturing Process”
- Exploring Team Leadership in Cross-Border E-Commerce: AI Mentors Empowering Organizational Behavior Smart Courses
- Path Analysis of Empowering Blended Teaching in Universities with Educational Agents
- Research on Party Member File Management under the PDCA Cycle: a Practical Path in Higher Education Based on Smart Education
- Critical Practical Approaches to AI in Undergraduate Fashion Design Pedagogy
人工智能赋能高中英语写作教学的实践研究
A Practical Study of Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Senior High School English Writing Instruction
Published: 2026-09-08
Author: 李元昊 :青岛大学外语学院 山东青岛; LI Yuanhao :School of Foreign Languages, Qingdao University, Qingdao;
Chinese Abstract: 在生成式人工智能快速进入教育场域的背景下，如何使其服务于英语学科核心素养发展，而非替代学生的思考与表达，成为高中英语写作教学亟须回应的问题。该文以外研版高中英语必修二Unit 2 "Time for a Change"为载体，构建“智能诊断—读思建构—协同生成—多元评价”的读思写一体化教学模式。本研究采用课堂行动研究方法，综合分析前期诊断、课堂观察、学习任务单、初修稿文本、平台过程记录及课后访谈。结果显示，人工智能支持的分层支架、追问反馈与修订记录能够促进学生完善“主张—理由—证据”论证链，增强读者意识与文化解释能力。本研究认为，人工智能宜作为诊断、支架与形成性反馈工具，其有效应用有赖于真实任务、教师审核、证据核验与过程性评价的协同保障。
Abstract: As generative artificial intelligence rapidly enters education, a pressing issue in senior high school English writing instruction is how to leverage it to support the development of students' core English competencies rather than replace their thinking and expression. Taking Unit 2, "Time for a Change", from the compulsory Book 2 of the FLTRP senior high school English textbook as the instructional context, this study develops an integrated reading-thinking-writing model featuring intelligent diagnosis, reading-thinking construction, collaborative production, and multi-dimensional assessment. Adopting a classroom action research approach, the study analyzes diagnostic results, classroom observations, learning task sheets, initial and revised drafts, platform process records, and post-lesson interviews. The findings show that AI-supported differentiated scaffolds, probing feedback, and revision records can help students refine claim-reason-evidence argument chains and enhance reader awareness and cultural explanation. AI should serve as a tool for diagnosis, scaffolding, and formative feedback; its effective use depends on the coordinated support of authentic tasks, teacher review, evidence verification, and process assessment.
Chinese Keywords: 人工智能赋能；高中英语；写作教学；英语学习活动观；形成性评价
Keywords: artificial intelligence; senior high school English writing; English learning activity-based approach; formative assessment